If I lose 40%, what does recovery really take?
A fall and the gain that undoes it are not the same number, and the gap widens fast. Set a drawdown and see exactly what getting back to even requires.
Your scenario
Returns assumed for the time to recover: 5%, 7%, 10% a year, held constant. The gain required does not depend on any of them.
Every point here is arithmetic, with no return rate anywhere in it: a fall of 50% takes a gain of 100% to undo, and the two figures are equal only at a fall of nothing.
Show the figures
| Fall from the peak | Gain required to get back to even |
|---|---|
| 5% | 5.26% |
| 10% | 11.11% |
| 20% | 25% |
| 30% | 42.86% |
| 40% | 66.67% |
| 50% | 100% |
| 60% | 150% |
| 70% | 233.33% |
| 80% | 400% |
These years are the only figures on this page that rest on something assumed: a return that repeats without variation, year after year, which no market has ever delivered. They say nothing about how long any real recovery took. A return of nothing yields no number at all, because capital that does not grow does not come back to where it started.
Show the figures
| Assumed annual return | Time to get back to even |
|---|---|
| 5% | 10.5 years |
| 7% | 7.6 years |
| 10% | 5.4 years |
